When I read Friday’s Gospel it struck me that the exact number of fish in a net was a curious thing to put in an account of a story about our ressurected Lord. This is Jn 21:1-14 where the ressurected Jesus, from shore, tells the disciples to cast the net on the right side of the boat, the net is filled with 153 large fish, Peter swims to shore, and Jesus is made known in the breaking of the bread.
153. It is an irritant. Is this a two-thousand year old fish story? an exageration? Fishermen are known for their tall tales, why not this one? “There were 153 of ‘em, and they were THIS BIG!”
I was letting this nagging question lie untended to eventually slip away when Martha, Martha asked “Why 153?”
I am a geek, and I am hopelessly addicted to Google: I must Google 153
First Google result: Curious Properties of 153 By Shyam Sunder Gupta says:
It is the smallest number which can be expressed as the sum of cubes of its digits: 153 = 13 + 53 + 33
It is equal to the sum of factorials of number from 1 to 5: 153 = 1! + 2! + 3! + 4! + 5!
The sum of digits of 153 is a perfect square: 1 + 5 + 3 = 9 = 32
Ok, not a normal, er, average, er, random (doh!), uhm, boring number. But what does that mean?
CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS RESEARCH MINISTRY Says:
1 = THE NUMBER OF UNITY.
5 = THE NUMBER OF GRACE.
3 = THE NUMBER OF DIVINE PERFECTION.
And then this:
In John 21:11, after the resurrection the disciples caught 153 fish. The word fish in Greek is ‘ixthus‘ which has a numerical equivalent of 1224, or 8 x 153. Remember, which is Jesus Christ is 888. 153 people received a blessing from Jesus in the four gospel (not counting the 5000 and examples like that).
Huh? Where did all these 8s come from?
Wikipedia has the following on 51 and 153 in the Numerology article:
Fifty-one has the meaning of repentance in the Bible. The number gets its meaning from Psalm 51, king David’s Psalm of repentance after his adultery with Bathsheba. The number 51 is confirmed by the 153 fishes (3 x 51) the disciples caught in John 21.
So 153 = triple repentance? For Peter? the triple-denyer?
Am I on a numerology kick? Nah. I just think that the Gospel writers were apt to encode extra information into their words by means of the symbolism of numbers. I don’t think these were meant to be hidden puzzles, like Easter egg features on DVDs, or that secret install of MS Flight Simulator inside Excel 97. No, these were as meaningful and as obvious as the numbers in today’s culture. Maybe I’d sound like a basketball snob if I referred to His Airness simply as “23″ but there would be no doubt among fans that I was talking about Michael Jordan. Similarly, I could evoke a complex and emotional response if I called something “another 911″.
I’m no fan of numerology, I think there are clues in the numbers.
Were there really 153 fish in that net? I bet there were.