These stories are everywhere, and if you don’t read them carefully you might think someone is being wronged. All of the indented text that follows is from a single Sioux City Journal article.
Sioux City Journal: Former Catholic teacher says suing church is difficult
lost his job and benefits — all because he broke church law by not getting an annulment.
- “Lost” should probably read “forfeited”.
- “all because he broke church law” trivializes the issue.
- “by not getting an annulment” is not possible and is a misrepresentation of the facts.
Girsch has taken the matter to court, suing the Cedar Valley schools and the Dubuque Archdiocese for breach of contract.
We shall get to this contract soon enough.
“Fighting the church is difficult for us,” said Girsch, 59. “They never want to talk about the legal part of this; they want to push the church part. They wrote a contract stating if I fulfilled it I could teach. I fulfilled it.”
How odd, the church wants to push the church part, Girsch must be perfectly flummoxed. He fulfilled this contract when he submitted his resignation. They were within it when they accepted.
In the year after his second wedding, Girsch negotiated a revised contract, the school board took two votes on whether he could stay, and the archbishop weighed in on the controversy. In the end, the social studies teacher was forced to resign.
However, after a widespread showing of support for Girsch, the school and archdiocese negotiated a revised contract. The agreement, signed Sept. 7, specified that Girsch would immediately seek an annulment through the archdiocese. If the annulment wasn’t granted, he would submit his resignation, which the school board could accept or reject.
I presume that this revised contract is the one Girsch and his lawyer call breached. It sounds like the school is making an effort to be accommodating.
Although many Catholics receive annulments, Girsch’s request was denied. The annulment proceedings are secret.
This strikes me as an unnecessary jab.
Girsch submitted his resignation July 12, but the Cedar Valley school board voted not to accept it, despite urgings from the archdiocese attorney to enforce church law.
When the 8-6 vote was announced, the room burst into applause.
This show of support for a popular teacher is nice, but does not make the situation of his second marriage right with the church.
“I thought it was over,” Girsch said. “I was so relieved that people stood up for us and that everybody was honorable.”
I wonder what he meant by “honorable”.
His sense of relief evaporated soon after, when Dubuque Archbishop Jerome Hanus sent a letter to the school board insisting that the board follow church law and archdiocesan policy.
A special board meeting was called for Aug. 6 in which the board reversed itself, voting unanimously to accept Girsch’s resignation.
As an employer, Catholic schools have the right to expect certain conduct from employees. I personally expect them to be particularly attentive to the public lives of teachers and the impressions those make on students. I think we can safely assume that the original contract gave the school ground to dismiss a teacher for a marriage against church law. You can see that it is the invalid marriage
The following is a very telling paragraph:
“We didn’t think the marriage was going to cause trouble,” Girsch said. “But a few days after the ceremony, I got called to the office. … They asked if I ever got an annulment. I said I hadn’t. Then they asked if I was aware that they could terminate me.”
If Girsch was wronged in this affair, it was by the school board’s July 12th vote when they told him he could stay.